Showing posts with label Leadership. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Leadership. Show all posts

The preparing For Leadership

Mission Junior College - The preparing For Leadership.
The content is good quality and helpful content, That is new is that you simply never knew before that I know is that I even have discovered. Prior to the distinctive. It's now near to enter destination The preparing For Leadership.

Do you know about - The preparing For Leadership

Mission Junior College! Again, for I know. Ready to share new things that are useful. You and your friends.

Introduction

What I said. It is not outcome that the actual about Mission Junior College. You see this article for information on that need to know is Mission Junior College.

How is The preparing For Leadership

We had a good read. For the benefit of yourself. Be sure to read to the end. I want you to get good knowledge from Mission Junior College.

Generally, citizen ascribe the success or failure of a leader to their qualification or fitness to lead. For this speculate when leaders are sought in the secular world, the qualifications of the individuals are commonly given primary considerations. On the contrary, a close exam of the call of great leaders God used in the Bible reveals that God was not primarily concerned about qualifications. Eims Leroy, observed that Leaders like Moses, Gideon and Jeremiah openly confessed their inadequacy to achieve the task God called them to do.1 If God was looking for superior men then he would not have called them.

Does it then mean that preparations are not principal for Leadership? agreeing to Gottfried Osei-Mensah, there are prerequisites for spiritual leadership.2 This statement implies that some form of preparing is necessary. In addition, it is clear from scripture that every leader that God used had sure qualities or abilities that were principal in performing their task. This notice however poses a question: Were those leaders ready for their calling or did they just happen to have the qualities God required? With God, things do not happen by chance, therefore the thesis of this record is, those whom God used in the Bible as leaders were always ready for their task.

To construe this thesis statement excellent leaders in the Bible are examined. The goal is, first to prove that the leaders were ready for leadership and second, to decree the nature of the preparing and its point to the leaders' call.

The following three categories of leaders have been excellent for this study:

a) Those whose call and commission came as a surprise to them
b) Those who were mentored by their predecessor
c) Those who assumed leadership as a follow of a crisis.

Under each leader the presentation will also be divided into three sections:

a) His life history before his call to leadership;
b) His leadership role and achievements;
c) overview of the exact ways he was ready for leadership. Finally an

evaluation would be made and conclusions drawn.

A. Leaders Whose Call And Commission Came As A Surprise

Among the leaders whose call and commission came as a surprise were Moses and Paul. These were leaders who had personal encounter with God whilst they were pursuing their own goals in life. These leaders would now be discussed individually to decree how each of them was ready for leadership.

Moses

a) His life history before his call to leadership

The Bible, in Exodus lesson 2-5, discusses the life of Moses from the time of his birth to that of his call. agreeing to this section, Moses was born in Egypt by Hebrew parents. But because of an edict by Pharaoh to kill all the Hebrew baby boys, his mom was unable to raise him up from childhood to adulthood. However, by what can be termed divine providence, Howard F. Vos stated that Moses probably spent the first two or three 'years of his life with his own mother.3 The remaining period of his first forty years was spent in the palace as an adopted son of Pharaoh's daughter. Commenting on the years Moses spent in Pharaoh's palace, John C. Maxwell observed that he received the best of what Egypt offered both physically as well as intellectually. Maxwell cited Acts 7:22 which states that Moses was learned in all the wisdom of the Egyptians and was superior in words and deeds.4

In spite of the fact that he was raised up in Pharaoh's palace Moses acknowledged his Hebrew identity. He had to flee Egypt because he killed an Egyptian to protect an oppressed Hebrew. The next forty years of his life he spent in Midian tending the flock of Jethro. It was in Midian, at about 80 years of age that God made the surprised call to him.

b) His leadership role and achievements

In this section the goal is just to make a brief reflection of Moses' main task and achievements. agreeing to John D. Hannah, in his annotation on Exodus, God commissioned Moses to deliver the children of Israel out of Egypt. He showed how that call and commission came as a perfect surprise to Moses.5 Although God also promised to take the Israelites to a good and spacious land, that commission, agreeing to Hannah, was not given to Moses. To keep his point, he made reference to Stephen's statement about Moses' mission in Acts 7:35-36, implying that there was no indication that Moses was supposed to take the Israelites to the promise land.6 Moses well closed the task God gave him in spite of all his objections about his inability when God called him. This was because he thorough in faith God's assuring words that he would be with him to achieve that mission and also because of his ambition to deliver the Israelites from slavery. Commenting on the aspect of his ambition, Ted Engstrom pointed out that "he never lost sight of his ambition and calling in life which made it possible".7 Throughout his mission these words of guarnatee had been a motivation for him.

In addition, Maxwell rightly observed, over the procedure of the years in the desert, Moses' leadership improved. He cited Jethro, Moses' father-in-law, as one man who helped to make that difference in his life.

Moses also closed something else that was not explicitly stated in scripture. D.A. Hubbard, in his record on the Pentateuch said that both Judaism and Christianity thorough without examine the biblical tradition that Moses wrote the Pentateuch.8 These writings had been great materials not just for spiritual purpose but also for academic purpose.

Paul

a) His life history before his call to leadership

According to Act 21:39;22:3, Paul was a native of Tarsus, a city of Cilicia. He was of pure Jewish descent and of the tribe of Benjamin (Phil 3:5). He was a Hebrew and a Pharisee. He spoke Greek and was customary with Aramaic (Acts 22:2). Paul, learned tent production because it was primary that all Jewish boys learn a trade.

In his book, 'Paul the Leader', Oswald J. Sanders made this notice about Paul: "all the formative years were calculated, to prepare him to be an eminent Pharisee and Rabbi like his great mentor Gamaliel".9 Paul studied under Gamaliel, a superior instructor of the law and of the school of Hillel. Sanders also recognize that the school of Hillel embraced a broader and more liberal view in schooling than that of Shammai - the other superior school.10 In addition, Sanders stated that unlike the school of Shammai, the school of Hillel was interested in Greek literature. In that school, Paul learned to use works of Gentile authors. He surpassed his fellow-students in both academic achievements and in zeal for both God and the tradition of his fathers. He was roughly a member of the Sanhedrin, the consummate legal and civil court.11

b) His leadership role and achievements

Oswald Sanders, noted that Paul became a great spiritual leader when his heart and mind were captured by Jesus.12 Such statements could not have been made if Paul had not made great achievements in the role God gave him to perform. Other writer, Ted E. Engstrom gave the background to Paul's success: "a Jew living in a Greek city, and with a Roman citizenship. Both by birth and training Paul possessed the tenacity of the Jews, the culture of the Greeks and the practicality of the Romans, and these qualities enabled him to adapt to the citizen among whom he was to move"13. agreeing to Acts lesson 9, when Paul encountered the Lord Jesus he was commissioned to take the gospel message to the gentiles. Records of Paul's accomplishments of his commission can be found in Acts Chapters 13-28. These included missionary journeys to gentile territories, Church planting, training or teaching ministries among the gentiles and flourishing debates with secular philosophers.

In increasing Paul also wrote thirteen of the New Testament Epistles. In these epistles he dealt with leading theological concepts like justification, sanctification and the resurrection of Christ. Varied portions of defense of the Christian faith against secular philosophies are also included in these epistles. agreeing to 2Tim. 4:7, Paul was sure he closed God's mission for his life when he stated that he has fought the good fight, closed the race and kept the faith.

B. Leaders Who Were Mentored By Their Predecessor

The second categories of leaders to be examined are those who were mentored by their predecessor. Among such leaders are Joshua, who succeeded Moses and Samuel, who succeeded Eli. These two leaders will be examined individually in this section.

Joshua

a) His life history before his call to leadership

The Bible gave a brief house background of Joshua in Exodus 33:11; Num. 1:10. He was the son of Nun, the son of Elishama, head of the tribe of Ephraim. Apart from this background, there is no other facts about him before he met Moses. The scriptures gave much focus to Joshua's mentoring association with Moses. This close working association between them can be traced in scripture.

According to exodus 24:13, when Moses went up Sinai to receive the two tablets for the first time Joshua accompanied him part of the way and was the first to meet him on his return (32:17). Also when the Israelites sinned by worshiping the golden calf, Moses moved the tabernacle covering the camp and left the congregation in fee of Joshua. In addition, Joshua was one of the twelve spies sent by Moses to recognize the land of Canaan. It was only after about forty years of mentoring by Moses in the desert that God directed Moses to give Joshua leadership authority over the people.

In his book, 'Leadership Images from the New Testament', David Bennett mentioned four steps in developing a leader from the example of Jesus. These are:

a) To develop leaders who have learned to follow
b) To train within the context of personal apprenticeship.
c) To make commitment to the society as well as training for a task.
d) To stress on the spiritual aspects of leadership.14

These four steps can be found in the roughly forty years mentoring association between Moses and Joshua. As Engstrom rightly puts it "Moses had the right attitude, when he knew it was time to train man else for leadership. He was fearful of being a paternal leader and pleaded with God to give the Israelite a successor".15 This might have been one of the reasons why he devoted himself to mentor Joshua.

b) His leadership role and achievements

Joshua's role was made clear to him when he was commissioned as the leader of Israel. His call and commission was mediated through Moses. In Numbers 27:12-22 the Lord reminded Moses that he would not enter the promise Land and that Joshua would replace him. Moses obeyed the Lord's instructions and commissioned Joshua before the whole Israelite assembly. This commission kept Joshua in focus throughout his mission and he kept his faith in the one who called him. As Donald K. Campbell rightly observed, Joshua interceded for the nation when the Israelites sinned and were defeated.16 God's mandate was that Joshua would lead the Israelites to the Promise Land and he depended on him to achieve that mandate. Commenting on the fee given to Joshua to be strong and courageous in Josh. 1:6, Campbell also said it was an affirmation that God would not let Joshua down.17 however this may also be seen as an indication that prior to the time he became Israel's leader he had potentials, which he needed to build up in leadership.

Details of how Joshua closed his mission have been recorded in the book of Joshua. The conquest of Canaan was however not an easy one but Joshua's training as a military leader and his dependence upon God gave him added advantage. He made mistakes but he learned from his mistakes.

Samuel

a) His life history before his call to leadership

According to John C. Maxwell, Samuel was extra from the time he was born because he was an write back to prayer. He further commented that, as young child, Samuel was settled in the care of Eli the High priest and Judge of Israel.18 This revealed that the mentoring association between Eli and Samuel started quite early in Samuel's life. Like Joshua, Samuel stayed in the same place with his mentor. In addition, at a very early age, God began to speak directly to him and that motivated him to reverence and serve God faithfully. The role played by Hannah in initiating this mentoring association should not be overlooked. McChesney and Unger said that it was a vow that Hannah made to dedicate Samuel to the Lord as a Nazarite.19

b) His Leadership Role and Achievements

To great understand and appreciate Samuel's achievements, one should first recognize the religious, political and communal situations prior to his assumption to leadership. Eugene H, Merrill rightly observed that "the 300 or so years of the history of Israel under the Judges were marked by political, moral, and spiritual anarchy and deterioration". It was in this background, where all seemed to have failed that Samuel was groomed and also took up leadership.20

With reference to his achievements, "Samuel's level of influence with the citizen prolonged to growth throughout his lifetime. As a prophet, he was respected because he spoke from God. But in time Samuel also became Israel's Judge, a position similar to that of a king. He was the nation's civil and military leader. Samuel judged Israel all the days of his life".21 Indeed, only leaders with sure qualities can achieve what Samuel achieved. It was that kind of excellent leadership that God was looking for in order to address the deteriorating situation in Israel. Israel enjoyed a time of peace while Samuel's reign.

C. Leaders Who Assume Leadership As A follow Of A Crisis

During the period between the death of Joshua and the start of Samuel's leadership, many citizen ruled Israel as Judges. All of them came to leadership as a follow of a emergency need. Gideon and Samson were two of the Judges who ruled Israel at that time. They will be examined in this section, as representatives of the Judges, to decree whether they were ready for their leadership roles.

Gideon

a) His life history before his call to leadership

In Judges lesson 6-8 the Bible gave a brief historic list of Gideon's house background. He was the son of Joash the Abiezrite. He was also of the tribe of Manasseh. One may want to advise that Gideon had no potential or inherent for leadership before he became a leader. This assumption is proved wrong in the light of the angel's greetings to Gideon - "mighty man of valor" (Judg. 6:12). As Joyce Peel rightly said, "the angel calls out his inexpressive qualities which we see developing in the rest of the story".22

It can be seen that Gideon already had faith in God from a examine he asked the angel - where are all the wonders that our fathers told us about when they said, "Did not the lord bring us up out of Egypt?" His parents have made him realize that in the past they have depended on God for survival. However, Gideon wanted an guarnatee that it was the God of his fathers talking to him, so he asked God to give him a sign (:17). Joyce Peel's annotation on Gideon's invite is that "it isn't for the sort of sign an unbeliever asks to evade a challenge but for a sign to confirm to a believer who is ready to obey".23 Gideon was convinced that God was speaking to him and based on that fact he responded to the call to meet the Midianite crisis.

b) His Leadership Role and Achievements

Gideon was called to achieve a exact role and that was to deliver Israel from the Midianites. He had a clear vision in mind as to what he had to do. He also believed that he could achieve his goal because he had the guarnatee of God. In increasing he had inner qualities, which gave him enough courage to move into action, even though he started at night. Gideon delivered the Israelites from the Midianites' oppression but he first brought them back to faith in God. However, immediately after his death the citizen turned back to their foreign gods.

Samson

a) His life history before his call to leadership

In Judges lesson 13-16 the Bible gave an list of Samson's life. Samson was the son of Manoah of Zorah and of the tribe of Dan. His birth was foretold to his parents by an angel. They were also told that he would be a Nazarite to God from the womb Iudg. 13:2-5,24). The Bible also says in Judg 3:24-25 that God blessed him and that the spirit of God began to stir him up while he was in Mahaneh Dan. From this list it can be observed that Samson was a man of unusual strength. In Hebrews 11:32 he was recognized as of the great men of faith. while Samson's time the philistines were suppressing the Israelites.

b) His leadership role and achievements

Samson's call and commission was mediated through his parents. agreeing to Judges 13:5 he was to start the deliverance of Israel from the hands of the philistines. As John Mazwell rightly points out, "despite his good start, Samson got himself into trouble many times, and in the end he closed poorly: he was weak, blind and enslaved by the enemy from whom he was supposed to deliver his people."24 Samson had the opportunity of becoming a great leader but his despicable character destroyed his leadership.

Conclusion

Three categories of leaders have been examined in this lesson to prove that the citizen that God called to leadership in the Bible were always ready for their tasks. The first class of leaders were those whose call came as a surprise to them. The second were those who were mentored by their predecessor and the third, were those who responded to a crisis. It was proved that all of these leaders had some form of preparing principal for their singular calling. These preparations may come from God, their parents, religious background, formal schooling or a mentor. Therefore one could terminate that God does not call any man to leadership who had not been prepared. God's call or one preparing does not guarantee success because the preparing for efficient leadership does not end with one's call.

End Notes

1 Eims Leroy, Be The Leader You Were Meant To Be Illinois: Victor Books, 1982), pp 8-13

2 Gottfied Osei-Mensah, Wanted: slave Leadership (Achimota: African Christian Press, 1990), pp 24-32

3 Howard F. Vos. Moses: The New Unger's Bible Dictionary (Leicester: Inter-Varsity Press, 1982), p 886.

4 John C. Maxwell, The 21 Most superior Minutes In a Leader's Day: Revitalizing Your Spirit and Empowering your Leadership (Nashville: Thomas \nelson Publishers, 2000), p. 300.

5 John D. Hannah, Exodus: The Bible Knowledge annotation (Colorado: Chariot Victor Publishers, 1985), p 112.

6 Ibid, P 121.

7 Ted W. Engstrom, The production of A Christian Leader: How to develop management and human relations skills (Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1976), P 29.

8 D.A. Hubbard, Pentateuch: The New Bible Dictionary (Leicester: Inter-Varsity Press, 1982), p 903.

9 Oswald J. Sanders, Paul the Leader: A vision for Christian Leadership Today (Eastboume: Kingsway Publication Ltd., 1982), pp 16/17.

10 Ibid, p 17

11 Ibid, p 19

12 Oswald J. Sanders, Spiritual Leadership (Chicago: Moody Press, 1980), p 40.

13 Ted E. Engstrom, The production of Christian Leader: How To develop management and Human Relations Skills (Zondervan Publishing House, 1976), p 20.

14 David W. Bennett, Leadership Images From The New Testament: A Practical Guide (Carlisle: Om Publishers, 1998), pp 33/4

15 Ted W. Engstrom, The production of a Christian Leader: How to develop management and human relations skill (Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1976), p 30

16 Donald K. Campbell, Joshua: The Bible Knowledge annotation (Colorado: Chariot Victor Publishing, 1984), p 326.

17 Ibid, P 328.

18 John C. Maxwell, The 21 Most superior Minutes In A Leader's Day: Revitalize Your Spirit and empower Your Leadership (Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1982), p 67.

19 E. McChesney and Merrill F. Unger, Samuel: The New Unger's Bible Dictionary (Leicester: Inter-Varsity Press, 1982), P 1121.

20 Eugene H. Merrill, Samuel: The Bible Knowledge annotation (Colorado: Chariot Victor Publishing, 1985), P 431.

21 John C. Maxwell, The 21 Most superior dinky in a Leader's Day: Revitalize Your spirit and Empower Your Leadership (Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 2000), p

22 Joyce Peel, A Journey through The Old Testament: The story of God's association with man. Woman and the world (Oxford: The Reading Fellowship, 1993), p 60

23 Ibid, p 60

I hope you will get new knowledge about Mission Junior College. Where you may put to use within your daily life. And just remember, your reaction is Mission Junior College. View Related articles associated with Mission Junior College. I Roll below. I even have suggested my friends to help share the Facebook Twitter Like Tweet. Can you share The preparing For Leadership.

The Characteristics of Good Leadership

Welcome to this blog of Mission Junior College.

Mission Junior College - The Characteristics of Good Leadership

The content is sweet quality and useful content, That is new is that you never knew before that I know is that I even have discovered. Before the unIque. it is now On the poInt of enter a destination The Characteristics of Good Leadership. And the content related to Mission Junior College.WARNING Please read this before.It's great to bring this Mission Junior College to the general public. If you wish me to share along with your friends to scan this nice article.Some other articles may be duplicate to the web, I'm sorry :(

Do you know about - The Characteristics of Good Leadership

Mission Junior College! Again, for I know. Ready to share new things that are useful. You and your friends.

Introduction

What I said. It just isn't the conclusion that the actual about Mission Junior College. You read this article for facts about anyone want to know is Mission Junior College.

How is The Characteristics of Good Leadership

We had a good read. For the benefit of yourself. Be sure to read to the end. I want you to get good knowledge from Mission Junior College.

Some leaderships have been characterized as good and have been used as challenges for others to emulate. This article any way raises an inevitable question: upon what criteria were these leadership characterized as good? It is inevitable that some leaders, whose leadership does not fall within this category, have good qualities that others can emulate. For this reckon it is foremost not only to know that a leadership has been characterized as good but also to know the characteristics that qualifies it as good. According to Anthony D'souza, leadership involves an inter-relationship in the middle of three elements:

(a) The capability skills and needs of the followers
(b) The need and expectations of the group
(c) The demands or requirements of the situation.1

It can be observed from what D'souza has said that the first element deals with the personality of the leader; the second, his followers and the third, the task to be accomplished.

On the basis of what has been said the characteristics of good leadership will be identified under the following headings:-

(a) The personal characteristics of the leader
(b) The characteristics of the followers
(c) The leader's task or mission. Prime leaders in the Bible, whose leaderships

have been classified as good will form the basis of this presentation.

(a) The Personal Characteristics of the Leader

It can be observed from scriptures that God was very selective in selecting leaders for definite tasks. God specifically chose Nehemiah to spearhead the rebuilding of the Jerusalem wall; Moses to bring the Israelites out of bondage in Egypt; Paul, to pioneer missionary work to the Gentiles and David, whose kinship would have a continuing dynasty, to replace Saul. These men surely had qualities that were considerable for good leadership. God recognized these qualities in them as potentials when He chose them.

In this section some of the qualities of leaders mentioned above will be discussed in a more normal way. The goal is to show that it has been recognized that the good personal qualities of leaders, when applied to leadership are characteristics of good leadership.

Nehemiah

In reflecting on the book of Nehemiah, John White said that "the book of Nehemiah serves primarily to unfold for us part of God's on-going plan for his people. But all the time it is the man, his character and his leadership that holds my interest".2 Two foremost things stand out from John White's evaluative statement about Nehemiah's leadership that are characteristic of good leadership. The first is the character and guide of Nehemiah himself as a leader and the second, is his leadership ability. White additional commended that probably one of the reasons why Nehemiah was chosen as a cupbearer was because of a well-trained personal capability like that of a stable character. Such well-trained stable character was not just the attempt of Nehemiah alone. This can be seen in the following statement - "God used Nehemiah's active prayer life to mold him into a godly leader".3 As a godly leader, Nehemiah was dependent upon God from whom he received his personal withhold and encouragement, which motivated him adequate to succeed. Nehemiah achieved his ministry goal and his leadership has been characterized as good. His good character and guide and his demonstration of leadership abilities were personal characteristics of his leadership, which made him succeed.

Moses

Moses' childhood training as an adopted son of Pharaoh's daughter was tailored towards leadership. The incidence, which led to his leave from Egypt, revealed that he recognized his leadership qualities before God called him to leadership. However, it took 40 years from the time of his leave from Egypt, before God called him to leadership. Joyce Peel observed that Moses learns how to be a shepherd. Long years of looking after sheep taught him the patience he was to need as leader of the cantankerous children of Israel.4 This observation by Joyce Peel shows that the personal capability of patience in Moses' life was a characteristic of his good leadership. This capability was made clear in the life of Moses straight through the great challenges he faced as a leader over Israel. One example was when he came down from Mount Sinai and found the habitancy worshiping the golden calf. He smashed the tablet inscribed with God's commandment, and, with a rousing cry, 'who is on the Lord's side?', summons the particular Levites to a massacre.5 The next day he reproaches the habitancy and then brokenhearted, goes back up the mountain to plead for their forgiveness.6

Patience was not the only personal capability that Moses had. But it has been used to show that good personal qualities, when applied to leadership, bring about inevitable results. Therefore, good personal qualities are characteristics of good leadership.

Paul

Paul made great achievements in the ministry God called him to. Achievements should any way be seen as pointers to personal abilities or qualities that a leader has that made him to succeed. What then were those qualities in Paul that made him to succeed? First it would be foremost to look at some of the achievements that Paul made. He made marvelous impact in his missionary work and also in his writing. John Stott observed that thirteen letters ascribed to Paul in our New Testament form roughly exactly one quarter of the whole New Testament. It was the rediscovery of the theology of Paul which led to the reformation of the sixteenth century, that theological revolution which prompted an upheaval within the Roman Catholic Church and led to the birth of all the present day Protestant Churches.7 Paul's educational background gave him this advantage. It should not go unnoticed that this great apostle used all that he had personally achieved in his formative years in his leadership role. Development use of his personal qualities in bringing about inevitable results in his leadership was a characteristic of Paul's good leadership.

David

According to Ted W. Engstrom, David the second king of Israel was a stunning contrast to Saul, the first king.8 This was because of his noble, generous and admirable qualities he demonstrated in his leadership. This comparison indicates that David's leadership was not only great than Saul's but his leadership can be characterized as good. John C. Maxwell also compared the two leaders. In sass to a question, which he posed - 'Why did Saul fail as Israel's king while David, who appeared to be weaker succeed?' he said that it was because of David's attitude. Unlike Saul, David tried to come to be a great leader.9 It is clear from these two authors that David's personal qualities, especially that of his attitude to all the time be a great leader were characteristics of his good leadership. Having the qualification or qualities is one thing, but applying them in one's leadership role is quite another. David applied his leadership qualities in foremost and made an impact as a leader.

The Characteristics of the Followers

Some of the characteristics of good leadership can be identified with the followers. Before identifying these characteristics, it would be helpful to inspect some definitions of leadership, to be reminded of the connection in the middle of leaders and followers. According to Oswald Sanders, leadership is influence. It is the capability of one man to work on others to follow his or her lead. Ted W. Enngstrom defines leadership with just two words - 'leaders lead'. Myron Rush also gave a definition of leadership and his definition of leadership as 'leader reproducing himself on the followers'. These definitions point to the connection in the middle of leaders and followers but most significantly, what they thought about to be the goal of the relationship. Oswald Sanders and Engstrom focus on the aspect of following. This focus identifies one of the characteristics of a good leadership - willing followers. If one gives observation to D'souza's point cited in the introduction, that one of the elements of leadership is 'the needs and expectations of the group', it follows that one reckon why habitancy will willingly follow their leader is because their needs and expectations are met. Someone else characteristic can be identified from Myron Rush's definition - Development leader out of followers, there is a guarantee of the continuity of that ministry. The four leaders, Nehemiah, Moses, Paul and David, whose leaderships have been classified as good, will now be used as test case to recognize the two characteristics.

Nehemiah

When Nehemiah returned to Jerusalem from Susa, he first personally assessed the situation of Jerusalem's destruction. Afterwards he called the habitancy and shared his vision. The Bible stated that the habitancy responded to Nehemiah (see Neh. 2:8). This shows clearly that from the start of his mission Nehemiah had willing followers. They were willing to follow because they perceive that the foresight was good and that some of their needs as a society will be met. Maxwell noted that the wall of Jerusalem was rebuilt because of Nehemiah's capability to work with habitancy and lead them where they need to go.10 This shows that Nehemiah had willing followers.

In addition Nehemiah gave recognition to subordinate leaders as he delegated responsibilities to them. This, as he said, opens the leadership potentials for others.11 Therefore one can rightly say that Nehemiah not only had willing followers but also leaders were reproduced under his ministry.

Moses

When Moses returned to Egypt to set the Israelites free, they were at first excited. But when Moses made their situation worse they were no longer excited about freedom. However, by the end of the ninth plague they had realized that Moses was God's servant sent to deliver them. They followed Moses' instructions in observing the Passover and then willingly followed him as he led them out of Egypt.

There is also scriptural evidence that leaders were produced under Moses' leadership. One example is that of Joshua, who supplanted him. Joshua who had been the personal assistant of Moses was mentored by Moses to come to be a leader. Moses' leadership therefore had the characteristics of willing followers and that of reproducing leaders.

Paul

Even when he was "Paul the aged", he remained the model and leader of a group of dynamic young men. The affection he kindled in his followers' heart was mirrored in the tears that flowed when he told them they would see him no more (Acts 20: 36-38).12 Sanders revealed in the duct cited above that the apostle Paul's leadership had the characteristics of willing followers. His ministry had great impact in the lives of many, who were also not willing to change his leadership for another.

Like the Lord Jesus, Paul invested his life on a few habitancy because he startling much from them. These were the habitancy he took on his missionary journeys. Two of the people, Timothy and Titus became leaders of local Churches. Therefore, like Moses, Paul's leadership had the characteristics of willing followers and that of producing leaders.

David

David rose to fame when he killed Goliath, the Philistine giant. Eugene H. Merrill, commenting on David's victory reserved that with his rising popularity among the habitancy came a deterioration of his connection with Saul, for the king became insanely jealous of Israel's new hero.13 It is inevitable that David had a large following. habitancy followed him because of the possible they saw in him. They recognized him as a great leader, even before legal recognition was given to him.

David ruled Israel for roughly 40 years and by the time he was stepping down as king, Solomon, his son had already been groomed for that position. So, like Nehemiah, Moses and Paul, David's leadership was characterized by willing followers and the producing of leaders.

(c) The leader's task or commission

It can be observed from scripture that God all the time give a definite task or mission to every man he calls to leadership. Some of the characteristics of good leadership can be identified in the way the leaders set out to perform their task or mission. There are two things that are of primary importance to how a leader accomplishes his task. These are his foresight and his style of leadership. A leader's foresight and style of leadership can be characteristics of both good and bad leadership. However, in this section the purpose is to shoe how these two characteristics can be characteristics of good leadership.

According to John Haggai, a foresight is foremost because it is a key factor in prosperous leadership.14 A leader can have a good foresight and yet his foresight does not lead in any way to make his leadership good. Haggai points out what a leader needs to do to make his foresight a contributing characteristic to good leadership. First, he says that both leaders and followers must grasp the vision. It is the leader's responsibility to help the followers understand the foresight and accept it. Second, both leader and followers must commit themselves to act on the vision. This activity involves designing a goal schedule to fulfill the vision. In this way both the leader and followers are ready to face difficulties and eliminate obstacles. It is in this way that a foresight can be a characteristic of good leadership.15

The other aspects mentioned that can be a characteristic of a good leadership is the style of leadership. Leadership styles have been given separate classification by authors. Anthony D'souza classified leadership styles in a continuum in which one end is described as task-oriented and the other as relationship-oriented.16 Myron Rush also agreed with D'souza that leadership styles can be seen in a continuum, but he used separate descriptive terms for the separate styles within the continuum.17 The four styles used within Rush's continuum are: dictatorial, authoritative, consultative and participative. These authors conference about styles was not to point out the best but rather to show the importance of all of them. The point that they were Development was that a good leadership had the characteristics of the separate leadership styles. The leader must be flexible to the changing situations. When he is able to adjust his leadership styles to changing situations, then his leadership styles... come to be characteristics of good leadership. Myron Rush gave examples of situations where singular leadership styles are appropriate. He said, dictatorial leadership style is approved in an emergency or when people's lives, are at stake; consultative style in conducting on-going planning for the agency or organization; authoritative style when employees constantly misuse authority and participative style as habitancy come to be competent in performing their routine responsibilities.18

The four leaders mentioned in this paper, whose leaderships have been classified as good, will now be used as test cases to resolve either the points mentioned here are characteristics of their leaderships.

Nehemiah

Joyce Peel, commenting on Nehemiah's task of building the walls of Jerusalem said that a dispirited nation needs an inspired leader who can unite and galvanize his habitancy into action. Such a man was Nehemiah.19 These words not only revealed that Nehemiah had a clear foresight of his task but also was able to make his followers understand the foresight and commit themselves to act on it. This was just one reckon why they were able to rebuild the walls in fifty-two days. Many Jews lamented over the ruins of Jerusalem city wall, but it took the foresight of one man, who united the habitancy and gave them hope to turn the situation. Engstrom also pointed to the fact that the habitancy caught Nehemiah's foresight and acted upon it, when he noted: "One has only to read the Book of Nehemiah to inspect the importance of habitancy at work. The leaders in building the temple and city walls never lost sight of the total goal and ample picture. They were able to keep this focus by using all the habitancy as well as experts who were trained to do definite work".20 Nehemiah's leadership had the characteristic of a clear foresight which was actively pursued by himself and his followers.

It can be observed from the book of Nehemiah, that Nehemiah used the consultative style of leadership when he got to Jerusalem to begin the work. any way in the last few chapters of the book, when things were going wrong, his style of leadership changed to an authoritative one. Therefore it can be said that Nehemiah's leadership had the characteristics of a foresight and a changing style of leadership.

Moses

Moses has a clear foresight when he returned to Egypt to lead the children of Israel out of bondage. The Israelites wanted to be free, but they doubted the possibility of Moses setting them free. However, when they became inevitable that Moses was God's servant who will set them free from bondage, they obeyed his instructions and later walked out of Egypt following him.

The biblical records also show that Moses varied his leadership styles. Before Jethro came to visit him, he carried a heavy load of work all by himself. Myron Rush pointed out that it was an authoritative style of leadership because Moses had to make every decision.21 After his encounter with Jethro his style of leadership changed to more of a consultative one.

Paul

Paul's foresight was not only clear to him but also to his followers. Since his Damascus road experience, he knew he has been called by God to be a missionary.

Sanders observed that Paul was a missionary trail-blazer, leaving behind him a string of new Churches. It is a considerable face that the many missionary advances of the last fifty years have followed the rediscovery or re-emphasis of Paul's missionary principles.22 It is because Paul's foresight and principle of accomplishing that foresight was so clear that long after he has gone habitancy still followed his steps.

It can also be seen from the Acts article that Paul varied his leadership styles. For example, in the contention in the middle of himself and Barnabas over John Mark, Paul displayed an authoritative style of leadership. Most times he is also authoritative when dealing with issues in the Church. At other times he demonstrated a consultative style of leadership - in the issue that lead to the Jerusalem council. It can be seen that Paul's leadership was characteristic of a clear foresight and changing leadership styles.

David

Two things are very clear in scripture about David. The first is his foresight for Israel and the second his foresight for God. David was a king of war and he led his army in battle against Israel's enemies and took the land God gave to them. He also lived his life in devotion to God. He had a foresight to build a dwelling place for the Lord. Although God denied him this privilege, he made great preparations for this temple, which was later built by his son Solomon.

It is clear in scripture that David changed his leadership styles in accordance with changing situations. He displayed an authoritative leadership style when he led his men in battle. For example in the situation when Nabal refused to bonus him and his men with food contribute for protecting his servants and sheep in the fields. At other times he demonstrated a consultative style of leadership. When the biblical records are examined, one could clearly see that David's leadership show characteristics of a clear foresight and a changing style of leadership.

Conclusion

In this article some of the characteristics of good leadership have been identified. This was done under the following headings: (a) the personal characteristics of the leader, the characteristics of the followers and the leader's task or commission. These divisions were based on the findings of Anthony D'souza, which revealed that leadership involves an inter-relationship in the middle of three elements - the leader, the followers and the task to be accomplished. Six characteristics of good leadership were identified and they are as follows:

a) The personal qualities of the leader, which give him his leadership ability.
b) The leaders guide or character which is formed by the godly life he is living.
c) The willingness of the habitancy to follow without coercing.
d) The reproducing of leaders from the followers.
e) The clear foresight of the leader, which at last becomes the people's foresight and

focus in the ministry.
f) The variations in the style of leadership to meet separate leadership situations.

Six leaders, whose leaderships have been characterized as good, were used as test cases to see either the qualities mentioned can be found in their leadership. It was proved that these characteristics were clear in each of their leadership. There are many more qualification of good leadership, but it is primary importance to have a balance in the three major areas identified. An individual can have all the good qualities of leadership and yet his leadership may not be good because of his style of leadership. Also, the habitancy may not follow the leader because his foresight is not clear to them. Good leadership does not only depend on the leader or on the follower or the style of leadership but on all three of these qualities. When there is a balance in these three areas, leadership becomes exceptional and that was the kind of leadership Nehemiah, Moses, Paul and David portrayed.

End Notes

1. Anthony D'souze, Being A Leader (Achimota: African Christian Press, 1990),

p 25.

2. John White, Excellence In Leadership: the Pattern of Nehemiah (Leicester:

Intervarsity Press, 1986), p 10-11.

3. Ibid, p 14.

4. Joyce Peel, A Journey straight through The Old Testament: The Story of God's

Relationship With Man Woman and the World (Oxford: The Bible Reading

Fellowship, 1993), p 35.

5. Ibid, p 41.

6. Ibid. P 41.

7. John Stott, Men With A Message: An Introduction To New Testament And Its

Writers (Suffolk: Evangelical Literature Trust, 1996), P 86.

8. Ted W. Engstrom, The Development of A Christian Leader (Michigan: Zondervan

Publishing House, 1976), p 30.

9. John C Maxwell, The 21 Most marvelous Minutes In A Leader's Day; Revitalize Your

Spirit an Empower Your Leadership (Nashville: Thomas Nelson's Publisher, 2000), p 4.

10. John C Maxwell, The 21 Most marvelous Minutes In A Leader's Day: Revitalize Your

Spirit and Empower Your Leadership (Nashville: Thomas Nelsons Publishers, 2000),

P 68.

11. Oswald Sanders, Spiritual Leadership (Chicago: Moody Press, 1994), p 166.

12. Oswald Sanders, Paul the Leader: A foresight For Christian Leadership Today (Glasgow:

Kingsway Publication Ltd., 1983), p 42.

13. Eugene H Merrill, I Samuel: The Bible Knowledge comment (Colorado: Chariot

Victor Publishing, 1985), p 449.

14. John Haggai, Lead On! Leadership That Endures In A Changing World (London: Word

Publishing, 1986), p 16.

15. Ibid. P 17.

16. Anthony D'souza, Being A Leader (Achimota: African Christian Press, 1990), p 36

17. Myron Rush; Management: A Biblical Perspective (Illinois: Victor Books, 1996), p 219.

18. Myron Rush, Management: A Biblical approach (Illinios: Victor Books, 1983), p 226.

19. Joyce Peel, Journey straight through the Old Testament: The Story of God's connection with

Man. Woman and the World (oxford: The Bible Reading Fellowship, 1993), p 141.

20. Ted W Engstrom, The Development of A Christian Leader: How To make Management

And Human Relations Skills (Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1976), p

21. Myron Rush, Management: A Biblical Perspective (Illinois: Victor Books, 1976), p 220.

22. Oswald Sanders, Paul: A foresight For Christian Leadership Today (Glasgow: Kingsway

Publication Ltd, 1983), p 967.

End Note

1. Anthony D'souza, Being A Leader (Achimota: African Christian Press, 1990),

p 25.
2. John White, Excellence In Leadership: the Pattern of Nehemiah (Leicester:

Intervarsity Press, 1986), p 10-11.
3. Ibid. P 14.
4. Joyce Peel, A Journey straight through The Old Testament: The Story of God's

Relationship With Man Woman and the World (Oxford: The Bible Reading

Fellowship, 1993), p 35.

I hope you receive new knowledge about Mission Junior College. Where you may put to used in your day-to-day life. And above all, your reaction is Mission Junior College. Read more.. The Characteristics of Good Leadership.
Avatar Of Me - Blogger SEO The Characteristics of Good Leadership (with Health & Product)
Rating :4 out of 5 (1 reviews.) You can comment below suggests. Thank you for following us all along. We look forward to creating a good time. Blogger SEOon
View Related articles associated with Mission Junior College. I Roll below. I even have counseled my friends to help share the Facebook Twitter Like Tweet. Can you shareThe Characteristics of Good Leadership